State of the Cities 2009 Masthead

Main Home2009 Report HomeCase Studies | Cluster Profiles | City Level Data | Methodology & Surveys


Cluster 6

 

Rural Communities

Overview | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14

Map - Cluster 6 - Rural Communities

Size – Small
Property value – Low
Commercial activity – Low
Growth – Low
Geography – East and west

Cluster Characteristics
Population
Other Community Characteristics

Fiscal Conditions
General Financial Outlook
Major Revenue Base

City Services

Community Conditions

Economic Conditions

Almira, Asotin, Bridgeport, Clarkston, College Place, Creston, Cusick, Dayton, Elmer City, Endicott, Farmington, Garfield, George, Hamilton, Harrington, Hartline, Hatton, Hoquiam, Ione, Kettle Falls, Kittitas, LaCrosse, Lamont, Lyman, Malden, Mansfield, Marcus, Mattawa, McCleary, Metaline, Nespelem, Northport, Oakesdale, Oakville, Odessa, Palouse, Pe Ell, Pomeroy, Riverside, Rosalia, Royal City, Soap Lake, South Bend, Sprague, Starbuck, Tekoa, Vader, Waitsburg, Warden, Washtucna, Waterville, Wilbur, Wilson Creek, Winlock  

These small communities have a strong rural character, with top employers in agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting industries. Many of the cities in this cluster are Washington’s smallest cities and towns with the lowest population growth of the last ten years. Many decreased the city workforce over the past four years and delayed or reduced spending on capital development projects. All of these cities receive assistance from the City-County Assistance Account.

All data is recorded as an average for all cities in the cluster.
Data for individual cities may vary significantly in some categories.


Community Conditions

Population

Year

1990 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Pop.

1,005 1,192 1,204 1,198 1,201 1,215 1,219 1,225 1,231 1,233

Other Community Characteristics

 


Fiscal Conditions

General Financial Outlook

 

(% of Respondents)

 

Less Able

Same

Better Able

Four Years Ago

44% 40% 16%

Next Year (2009)

42% 54% 4%

In Next Four Years (2012)

56% 40% 4%

Major Revenue Base


City Services

 

Services Most
Difficult to Sustain

% of Cities in Cluster

 

Services Most Improved

% of Cities in Cluster

Streets

66%

 

General administration

43%

Business recruitment 29%   Planning 35%

Sewer

26%

 

Water

32%

 

 

 

Parks

32%

 


Community Conditions

 

(% of Respondents)

 

Major
Problem

Moderate
Problem

No
Problem

Availability of employment opportunities

66% 23% 11%

Vitality of downtown/retail corridors

53% 38% 9%

Public transportation

24% 32% 44%

Local Conditions

% of Cities in Cluster

Vitality of downtown/retail corridors

71%

Availability of employment opportunities

63%

Availability of affordable housing

26%


Economic Conditions (2000 US Census Data)

Year

1999

Median Household Income

$28,893

Major Local Employers

% of Cities in Cluster
(w/ Industry as 1 of 3 Top Employers)

Retail trade 54%
Health care and social services 52%
Educational services 48%

Manufacturing

43%

Agriculture, forestry, fishing, hunting

39%

 

AWC Website | About AWC | Contact Us

State of the Cities © 2009 Association of Washington Cities

Association of Washington cities ▪ 1076 Franklin st. se ▪ Olympia, wa 98501 ▪ 360-753-4137 ▪ www.awcnet.org