Main Home | 2009 Report Home | Case Studies | Cluster Profiles | City Level Data | Methodology & Surveys
Overview | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14
|
Size – Small |
Cluster Characteristics Fiscal Conditions |
| Almira, Asotin, Bridgeport, Clarkston, College Place, Creston, Cusick, Dayton, Elmer City, Endicott, Farmington, Garfield, George, Hamilton, Harrington, Hartline, Hatton, Hoquiam, Ione, Kettle Falls, Kittitas, LaCrosse, Lamont, Lyman, Malden, Mansfield, Marcus, Mattawa, McCleary, Metaline, Nespelem, Northport, Oakesdale, Oakville, Odessa, Palouse, Pe Ell, Pomeroy, Riverside, Rosalia, Royal City, Soap Lake, South Bend, Sprague, Starbuck, Tekoa, Vader, Waitsburg, Warden, Washtucna, Waterville, Wilbur, Wilson Creek, Winlock | ||
|
These small communities have a strong rural character, with top employers in agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting industries. Many of the cities in this cluster are Washington’s smallest cities and towns with the lowest population growth of the last ten years. Many decreased the city workforce over the past four years and delayed or reduced spending on capital development projects. All of these cities receive assistance from the City-County Assistance Account. All data is recorded as an average for all cities in the cluster.
|
||
Average Population Size:
Year
1990 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Pop.
1,005 1,192 1,204 1,198 1,201 1,215 1,219 1,225 1,231 1,233
Population Density, 2007: 1,069 persons per square mile
Population Growth Rate, 2000-2007: 1.2%
Date of Incorporation: 1908
GMA-Planning Cities: 52%
Number of Housing Units:
| 2000 | 2008 | Growth- 2000-2008- |
| 507 | 529 | 4% |
Ability to Meet Needs Compared to Current Year:
(% of Respondents)
Less Able
Same
Better Able
Four Years Ago
44% 40% 16% Next Year (2009)
42% 54% 4% In Next Four Years (2012)
56% 40% 4%
Per Capita Assessed Value, 2007: $32,226
Per Capita Sales Tax Revenue, 2007: $57
Services Most
Difficult to Sustain% of Cities in Cluster
Services Most Improved
% of Cities in Cluster
Streets
66%
General administration
43%
Business recruitment 29% Planning 35% Sewer
26%
Water
32%
Parks
32%
Top Community Issues:
(% of Respondents)
Major
ProblemModerate
ProblemNo
ProblemAvailability of employment opportunities
66% 23% 11% Vitality of downtown/retail corridors
53% 38% 9% Public transportation
24% 32% 44%
Most Important Community Conditions to Address in Next Four Years:
Local Conditions
% of Cities in Cluster
Vitality of downtown/retail corridors
71%
Availability of employment opportunities
63%
Availability of affordable housing
26%
Median Household Income:
Year
1999
Median Household Income
$28,893
Poverty Rate, 1999: 20%
Major Local Employers by Industry:
Major Local Employers
% of Cities in Cluster
(w/ Industry as 1 of 3 Top Employers)Retail trade 54% Health care and social services 52% Educational services 48% Manufacturing
43%
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, hunting
39%
AWC Website | About AWC | Contact Us
State of the Cities © 2009 Association of Washington Cities
Association of Washington cities ▪ 1076 Franklin st. se ▪ Olympia, wa 98501 ▪ 360-753-4137 ▪ www.awcnet.org |