State of the Cities 2009 Masthead

Main Home2009 Report HomeCase Studies | Cluster Profiles | City Level Data | Methodology & Surveys


Cluster Profiles

Analysis about the fiscal conditions of Washington's 281 cities was done by dividing cities into clusters based on similar economic characteristics. After separating cities into two groups based on 2000 U.S. Census defined metro areas and non-metro areas, cities were initially divided based on the results of a statistical analysis.

Fourteen different city clusters were identified, each with their own name and number. Clusters one through six contain cities located in non-metro areas as defined by the 2000 U.S. Census. Clusters seven through 14 include cities located in metro areas. Characteristics of the 14 clusters are explained below.

Read more about the cluster methodology here.

Non-Metro Area Cities

Regional Centers - Cluster 1

Size – Largest in non-metro areas
Property value – Moderate
Commercial activity – Moderate
Growth – Moderate
Geography – East and west
For example: Pullman, Centralia

Natural Resources/Light Industrial Hubs - Cluster 4

Size – Small
Property value – Moderate
Commercial activity – Moderate
Growth – Low
Geography – East and west
For example: Pateros, Forks

Rural Commercial Centers - Cluster 2

Size – Small
Property value – Moderate
Commercial activity – High
Growth – Moderate
Geography – Mostly east
For example: Omak, Shelton

Small Residential - Cluster 5

Size – Small
Property value – Low
Commercial activity – Low
Growth – Moderate
Geography – Mostly east
For example: Entiat, White Salmon

Tourism Hubs - Cluster 3

Size – Small
Property value – High
Commercial activity – High
Growth – Moderate
Geography – East and west
For example: Ocean Shores, Winthrop

Rural Communities - Cluster 6

Size – Small
Property value – Low
Commercial activity – Low
Growth – Low
Geography – East and west
For example: Bridgeport, Pe Ell


Metro Area Cities

Largest Cities - Cluster 14

Size – Largest
Property value – Moderate
Commercial activity – Moderate
Growth – Low to moderate
Geography – Mostly west
For example: Tacoma, Spokane

Mixed Resources - Cluster 10

Size – Medium
Property value – High
Commercial activity – High
Growth – High
Geography – All west
For example: Arlington, Issaquah

Major Commercial Centers - Cluster 13

Size – Large
Property value – High
Commercial activity – High
Growth – Low to moderate
Geography – All west
For example: Tukwila, Lynnwood

High Income Residential - Cluster 9

Size – Small
Property value – Highest
Commercial activity – Moderate
Growth – Low
Geography – All west
For example: Hunts Point, Medina

Medium Commercial Centers - Cluster 12

Size – Large
Property value – Moderate
Commercial activity – Moderate
Growth – Low to moderate
Geography – East and west
For example: Pasco, Lacey

Residential - Cluster 8

Size – Medium
Property value – High
Commercial activity – Moderate
Growth – High
Geography – Mostly west
For example: Normandy Park, Camas

Small Commercial Centers - Cluster 11

Size – Small
Property value – Moderate to high
Commercial activity – High
Growth – High
Geography – Mostly west
For example: Yelm, Union Gap

Urban Outskirts - Cluster 7

Size – Small
Property value – Moderate
Commercial activity – Moderate
Growth – Moderate
Geography – East and west
For example: Eatonville, Zillah


For an alphabetical list of all cities and respective cluster membership click here.

 

State of the Cities © 2009 Association of Washington Cities

Association of Washington cities ▪ 1076 Franklin st. se ▪ Olympia, wa 98501 ▪ 360-753-4137 ▪ www.awcnet.org