Strong Cities, Strong State— Economic Development in Washington Cities and Towns
Main Home | 2007 Report Home | Cluster Profiles
Overview | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14
|
Albion, Cashmere, Castle Rock, Colton, Cosmopolis, Coulee Dam, Davenport, Electric City, Entiat, Krupp, Lind, Napavine, North Bonneville, Prescott, Reardan, Roslyn, Rock Island, Sedro-Woolley, South Cle Elum, White Salmon |
Size: Growth:
Fiscal:
For more information about cluster size, growth and fiscal condition, visit 2005 cluster profile. |
Economic Development |
Data on this page was collected from an AWC survey on economic development.
Percent of cities with economic development departments or staff members: 0%
Year city began to fund department or staff member: N/A
Number of FTE designated for economic development purposes: N/A
Percent of cities with a written economic development plan: 29%
Percent of cities using the economic development element of the comprehensive plan as their economic development plan (reported percentage is of those answering yes to previous question): 100%
Focus of city economic development efforts
|
Industry Area |
% of Cities in Cluster |
| Retail/Service | 86% |
| Tourism/Hospitality | 71% |
| Manufacturing | 29% |
| Residential (commuters) | 29% |
| Agricultural | 14% |
| Warehousing/Distribution | 14% |
| Technology/Telecommunications | 0% |
| Institutional | 0% |
Major city economic development strategies*
|
Strategies |
% of Cities in Cluster |
| Quality of Life Improvements | 80% |
| Infrastructure Improvements | 60% |
| Downtown Revitalization | 60% |
| Comments made under “other” by one or
more cities: Recreational; Entry-feature improvements |
|
City services used to promote economic development*
|
Services |
% of Cities in Cluster |
| Infrastructure | 100% |
| Zoning | 100% |
| Parks/Recreation Services | 80% |
| Real Estate Development | 60% |
| Special Event and Facility Services | 60% |
| Streamlined Permitting Process | 50% |
| Arts/Cultural Services | 50% |
| Streamlined Business Licensing | 50% |
Tools used to promote economic development*
|
Tools |
% of Cities in Cluster |
| Public Works Trust Fund Low Interest Loans | 100% |
| Community Development Block Grant | 75% |
| Rural/Distress County Sales Tax | 50% |
Major city barriers to economic development*
|
Barriers |
% of Cities in Cluster |
| Limited Number of Major Employers | 100% |
| Distance from Major Markets | 80% |
| Lack of Skilled City Economic Development Staff | 75% |
| Access to Technical Expertise | 75% |
| Lack of Private Sector Capital/Funding | 60% |
| Federal/State Mandates | 60% |
| Environmental Regulations | 60% |
| Lack of Commercial Office/Building Availability | 60% |
| Lengthy State Permit Process | 50% |
|
Inadequate Infrastructure |
50% |
Infrastructure improvement and expansion needs that are barriers to economic development
|
Industry Area |
% of Cities in Cluster |
| Sidewalks | 60% |
| Streets | 60% |
| Sewer | 40% |
| Advanced Telecommunications | 40% |
| Bridges | 25% |
| Water Availability/Quality | 20% |
| Stormwater | 0% |
|
Comments made under “other” by one or more cities: |
|
* Items noted were indicated by 50% or more of cities within the city cluster
AWC Website | About AWC | Contact Us
State of the Cities © 2007 Association of Washington Cities
Association of Washington cities ▪ 1076 Franklin st. se ▪ Olympia, wa 98501 ▪ 360-753-4137 ▪ www.awcnet.org |
