Assessing the Health of Washington's Cities and Towns

Main Home2005 Report HomePress Room | Cluster Profiles | City Level Data | Talking Points


Cluster 1

 

Regional Centers

Overview | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14

Anacortes, Centralia, Ellensburg, Longview, Moses Lake, Mount Vernon, Port Angeles, Pullman, Walla Walla, Wenatchee

Size:
Largest in non-metro areas.

Growth:
Low rate of growth over the 1990s, though higher than other non-metro area cities.

Fiscal:
Commercial activity is relatively high, producing high per capita sales tax revenue. The residents of these cities tend to have lower median household incomes, on average, than the largest cities in metro areas (“Central Cities”).

Community Conditions
Population
Economy
Other Community Characteristics

Fiscal Conditions
General Financial Outlook
Major Revenue Base
Significant Budget Drivers
Initiative Impacts
Transportation/Infrastructure

All data is recorded as an average for all cities in the cluster.
Data for individual cities may vary significantly in some categories.


Community Conditions

Population

Year

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

Pop.

18,579 18,820 19,177 19,504 19,826 20,236 20,582 20,996 21,489 21,858 22,145 22,241 22,434

Economy

Year

1999

1989

Median Household Income

$32,221
(in 1989 dollars)

$30,574

Year

2000

1990

Unemployment Rate

5.7%

5.6%

Major Local Employers

% of Cities in Cluster
(w/ Industry as 1 of 3 Top Employers)

Retail trade 90%
Manufacturing 60%
Educational Services 50%

Health care and social assistance

40%

Accommodation and food services

20%

Other Community Characteristics

Local Conditions

% of Cities in Cluster

Vitality of downtown/main street

50%

Overall economic conditions of community

38%

Homeland Security/Emergency Preparedness

25%

Availability of quality affordable housing

25%

Pedestrian-friendly environment

25%

Drinking water systems

25%

Local Conditions

% of Cities in Cluster

Overall city budget condition

63%

Traffic congestion

50%

Drugs/alcohol abuse

25%

Overall economic conditions of community

25%

Streets/bridges

25%

City property tax base

25%

Local Conditions

% of Cities in Cluster

Overall economic conditions of community

57%

Overall city budget condition

57%

Traffic congestion

43%


Fiscal Conditions

General Financial Outlook

 

(% of Respondents)

 

Less Able

Same

Better Able

Five years ago

75%

13%

13%

Next Year

63%

38%

0%

In Next Five Years

88%

13%

0%

Major Revenue Base

Significant Budget Drivers

Positive Budget Influences

% of Cities in Cluster

 

Negative Budget Influences

% of Cities in Cluster

Amount of reserves

43%

 

Cost of employee health benefits

89%

Value of city sales tax base

43%

 

Cost of liability coverage

89%

Business/economic development

43%

 

Tax-limiting voter initiatives

67%

Initiative Impacts

Impacts

% of Cities in Cluster

Used Reserves

86%

Reduced Services

43%

Eliminated Staff Positions

43%

Reduced Staff Training

43%

Increased User Fees

43%

Diverted Services

29%

Increased Taxes

29%

Adopted New User Fees

14%

Eliminated Services

0%

Transportation/Infrastructure

New Capacity Needs

Replacement Needs

Stormwater
Sidewalks
Sewer
Water
Street lighting
Streets
Bridges

Stormwater
Sewer
Water
Street lighting
Streets
Sidewalks
Bridges

Spending

% of Responding Cities (5) in Cluster

Delayed Spending over the Past 6 Years

100%

Expect to Delay Spending Over the Next 6 Years

100%


* = High degree of variability in cluster data

 

AWC Website | About AWC | Contact Us

State of the Cities © 2005 Association of Washington Cities

Association of Washington cities ▪ 1076 Franklin st. se ▪ Olympia, wa 98512 ▪ 360-753-4137 ▪ www.awcnet.org